What Makes A View Strong? How Do We Evaluate Them?

Published on October 31, 2011
by The Glaring Facts

What makes a good objective theory?

Objective Theories

  • Explanatory Power – explanation of data
    • How well it make sense out of chaos. How it provides an order to chaos.
    • Which are the most important variables to attend to and which are irrelevant. Which things to look at, which things to avoid.
    • E.g. Weathermen/women use tools like a barometer to calculate shit.
    • How well does a theory explain power?
  • Predictive Power – prediction of future events
    • How well your theory can explain what would happen next!
    • Prediction of future events
    • The use of probability, likelihood of an action occurring twice.
  • Parsimony – relative simplicity
    • The relative simplicity of a theory. A good objective theory is as simple as possible—no more complex than it has to be.
    • Occam’s Razor (Getting rid of superfluous information)
    • (Opposite of a) Rube Goldberg Machine (COMM1F90…the study of how simple things are turned complex….PSYC1F90)
  • Testability (must be falsifiable) – hypotheses that can be tested
    • It has to be possible to be proven wrong
    • It’s not that you prove the theory false, but it’s a test that has to be possible.
    • If a prediction goes wrong, there has to be a way to demonstrate the error.
    • If there is no way to prove it false, then the claim that it is true seems hollow.
      • E.g. “I can do a lay-up and it would never miss.” – It may go in the first 3 times, but may miss the 4th time.
    • Social exchange theory uses an economic model to explain stuff
    • Anytime a theory is a circular logic, it must be falsifiable
  • Utility – practical utility
    • A good theory allows you to do something useful, control something
    • You can make use of something
    • Theories of persuasion, planning an ad campaign (Practical situations)
    • If you don’t understand it, it’s relatively useless.
      • Eg. Cybernetic tradition
  • Internal Consistency
    • A good theory hangs well together
    • One theorem that contradicts another, it does not have internal consistency
    • How well the parts of a theory come well together
  • Heuristic
    • Good theories lead to heuristic (Rules, suggestions, guides, or techniques that may be useful in making progress toward a solution of a problem) questions.
    • Leads to more questions for investigations
    • Does the theory lead you to ask new questions?

What makes an interpretive theory good?

Interpretive and Critical Theories

  • new understanding of people
    • subjective understanding, instead of wanting an objective one
    • What does it feel like for the person viewing the film (must be shitty if it is Miami Vice)
    • Participant viewpoint.
    • identification of values
    • science wants explanation; humanism wants subjective understanding
  • clarification of values
    • What values are important to people?
    • Acknowledges the values of the theorist.
    • A good theory would analyzes values
      • Does the media influence you? Most say no.
  • aesthetic appeal
    • the form of a communication theory can capture the imagination of a reader just as much as the content does
  • community agreement
    • we can identify a good interpretive theory by the amount of support it generates within a community of like-minded scholars
  • reform society
    • a good interpretive theory often generates change; have an impact on society.

Comments are closed.